The Purge

PvP for People Who Aren't Asshats
It is currently Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
Warning: May freak you out.

Investigative Evidence:

Paulides-Coast to Coast Interview-4/25/12
Pt.1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... PtqK9-2sWk
Pt.2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... tBW1lbLONU

Strange Disappearances: Paulides Coast to Coast Interiew:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JS2rMpezuQ

News Reports and other Info:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuab1N2 ... D8&index=3

New DNA Evidence: IF valid, reproducibly for peer review, this will be earth shattering.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBfzUd5vQ5Q

If you search for David Paulides, there are additional interesting videos, interviews and his organizations website.

Now, to be clear, I am not a "believer" in anything but I have been following the "Bigfoot" phenomenon for over ten years, cautiously and with great skepticism.
As an armature archeologist who is married to a anthropologist, we both have our own opinions and hypnosis regarding the subject. The fact that the fossil record
in the N. America contains zero evidence of "ape" specimens but there are documented accounts of finds that contain "giant native American" skeletons, quietly hushed
up by the scientific community (largely out of fear and legal prohibitions for analysis), is revealing in and of itself. But when coupled with recent genetic evidence linking
several native American tribes to close European decadency, their historic accounts of a strange tribe of 'giants", one is compelled to investigate the links.

Evidence pertaining to the existence "Bigfoot", coming from blurry video/photos, eye witness accounts and the like are untrustworthy and unconvincing. The reason I am
following this situation, is simply because they are claiming that DNA has been sequenced and tested; such scientific evidence would be convincing if it turned out to be
factual. IF on the other hand is is simply a hoax or ploy for money/fame, then likewise, it will be proven scientifically to be so, thus end of story.

This is a hobby of mine and I thought I would share it with you all, if you have questions just ask me, I love talking about human evolution.


Last edited by Ingleram on Wed May 01, 2013 5:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:49 pm 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
For updates on the DNA research, here is Dr. Ketchums' FB page.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Melba ... 5637446173


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
A Response to reading Dr. Ketchum's DNA research paper.


“As a scientist I would consider anything.The currency of scientific advance is keeping your skepticism at bay. You have to approach these things incredibly agnostically. As I read the paper I asked, is the evidence here compelling? I don’t know. Is there clear evidence of fraud? That’s not apparent. It’s an intriguing hypothesis. One would need to view more sequencing information before supporting the conclusions.”

Specifically, Gibbs said, it’s standard protocol to upload the raw sequencing data which can then be analyzed to determine whether this is a new species, or simply an amalgam of existing species. Only a text file, which is unhelpful, accompanies the paper.

Dr. Richard Gibbs, Ph.D.
Bailer College School of Medicine, Wofford Cain Chair in Molecular and Human Genetics Professor,
Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Director of Human Genome Project

____________________


So, this is sort of a "yes, interesting BUT.... where is the raw sequencing data?" In my opinion, this is a "red flag" and unless Dr. Ketchum presents the raw data, something maybe wrong here.


__


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:18 pm 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
Ok, Dr. Ketchum did respond about the raw data sequences and said this:

"To those that arent finding all the data in the paper:
The data is with the paper. It is in the Supplemental data files that can be downloaded with the paper. It gives the sequences that we used in the paper. The entire 3 terabytes of whole genome data is impossible to put out with the paper but we gave all of the sequence data we used in the paper. GenBank wouldn't take it when first sent to them. So we just provided what we used in the paper.

Furthermore, we do have the entire dataset farmed out for independent evaluation but that takes time. 3 terabytes is a huge amount of data and just scratching the surface can take months."

____

So, shes confirming that the raw data is there, but has not been able to submit it to the GenBank yet. Once that occurs, this will allow for further evaluation and study and eventually confirm or disprove her findings. End of story.

____

She also has stated:

"We just heard from some mtDNA geneticists and they have found uniqueness in our mtDNA findings that prove that 1. The data is real and couldn't have been hoaxed 2. That it shows relatedness amongst a large percentage of the samples 3. Supports our hybridization theory 4. Supports our timeline. I am estatic. We are asking permission to make these findings public. As soon as we have it, we will post them."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:52 am 
Offline
cRPG Warband
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:29 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Southwestern Ontario
So should I loom my long bow or my rus bow?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
I posted some new links about the research done surrounding mysterious disappearances, in the original post.

Very disturbing information; whatever you think, if you have children, keep them dam close and in view when your
hiking or camping / picnicking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:52 pm 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
Thought I would post these up. Part 1 and Part 2 of Bill Munns analysis of the Patterson-Gimlin footage. Its well done a History Channel show, I will try to find an HD version of it.

Basically, the "PG-Film" is either the greatest hoax in the history of the film industry OR it is footage of an undocumented species (it cant be both). After sixty years, no proof of a hoax has been proven, though many still debate the issue. In my opinion, having worked in film/video production, it is authentic. What is in the footage, I don't know, but it is not a fake nor is it a man in a costume nor any film trickery form that period of time. A few years ago I downloaded the PG-Film and ran it though several image enhancers on an AVID editing system. I was, like many before, able to bring out more detail and demonstrate that the subject is real, that there is depth and the lighting is all aligned.

As always, think what you may of it....


Links: 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex ... oSOhZONAMo

Links: 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex ... Mo&index=2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:20 am 
Offline
cRPG Warband
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 3:30 pm
Posts: 61
Ingleram wrote:
Thought I would post these up. Part 1 and Part 2 of Bill Munns analysis of the Patterson-Gimlin footage. Its well done a History Channel show, I will try to find an HD version of it.

Basically, the "PG-Film" is either the greatest hoax in the history of the film industry OR it is footage of an undocumented species (it cant be both). After sixty years, no proof of a hoax has been proven, though many still debate the issue. In my opinion, having worked in film/video production, it is authentic. What is in the footage, I don't know, but it is not a fake nor is it a man in a costume nor any film trickery form that period of time. A few years ago I downloaded the PG-Film and ran it though several image enhancers on an AVID editing system. I was, like many before, able to bring out more detail and demonstrate that the subject is real, that there is depth and the lighting is all aligned.

As always, think what you may of it....


Links: 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex ... oSOhZONAMo

Links: 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex ... Mo&index=2


what makes it not possible for it to be just a big hairy dude


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:57 am 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
haroldcrumb wrote:
Ingleram wrote:
Thought I would post these up. Part 1 and Part 2 of Bill Munns analysis of the Patterson-Gimlin footage. Its well done a History Channel show, I will try to find an HD version of it.

Basically, the "PG-Film" is either the greatest hoax in the history of the film industry OR it is footage of an undocumented species (it cant be both). After sixty years, no proof of a hoax has been proven, though many still debate the issue. In my opinion, having worked in film/video production, it is authentic. What is in the footage, I don't know, but it is not a fake nor is it a man in a costume nor any film trickery form that period of time. A few years ago I downloaded the PG-Film and ran it though several image enhancers on an AVID editing system. I was, like many before, able to bring out more detail and demonstrate that the subject is real, that there is depth and the lighting is all aligned.

As always, think what you may of it....


Links: 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex ... oSOhZONAMo

Links: 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex ... Mo&index=2


what makes it not possible for it to be just a big hairy dude



ROFL. Well if so, he has tits and a really bad barber.... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:26 am 
Offline
cRPG Warband

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 126
The DNA study has been made public and free now. Here is the primary paper (there are also several documents containing supplemental information). Since the release of this information over a year ago, several noted Anthropology professors have come forward to state that, this paper proves the existence of a undocumented species. It is all quite interesting.

Link: http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/data/ ... wnload.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group