12-16-2009, 03:19 PM
12-16-2009, 05:24 PM
It would mean more of them would be using AMD chips, which makes AMD a buy!
12-16-2009, 05:28 PM
to answer your question, it would do basically nothing. Intel has deep pockets, at worst they'll have to cough up a big settlement.
-ken
-ken
12-16-2009, 06:37 PM
AMD should be out of business already, but is kept on lifesupport so Intel wont have a true monopoly. Every year AMD falls further behind in manufacturing advances and R&D.
I cant really see how you can have much competition in the CPU business since everything created revolves around that CPU. Sharing your hardware & design info on CPU product is deterimental to your success as thats what you paid billions to obtain in the first place. Compatibility between different companies is a nightmare for the end user.
I dont see any good solution to this problem. Only thing I can think of is give the fines to a company with completely different technology (ie..optical photon based CPU or some of that crazy crystal)shit)
I cant really see how you can have much competition in the CPU business since everything created revolves around that CPU. Sharing your hardware & design info on CPU product is deterimental to your success as thats what you paid billions to obtain in the first place. Compatibility between different companies is a nightmare for the end user.
I dont see any good solution to this problem. Only thing I can think of is give the fines to a company with completely different technology (ie..optical photon based CPU or some of that crazy crystal)shit)
12-17-2009, 01:29 AM
Yea what Snow said. Might be some dips, but this will be like the Microsoft anti trust stuff, which really had very little long term impact.
12-18-2009, 09:48 AM
I drove by an intel building yesterday. They seem to be doing just fine.