05-28-2009, 09:47 AM
I've always preferred the immersion of living world games. Of course they must always be tempered with a "you can't steal bases at 4am eastern" mechanic.
Living world games are "alive" for me. IMO, they take us closer to the ultimate game whereas war games lead us further away. If I think back to my favorite games (besides Warbirds) they were all living world.
Living world games are "alive" for me. IMO, they take us closer to the ultimate game whereas war games lead us further away. If I think back to my favorite games (besides Warbirds) they were all living world.
"Hamilton is really a Colossus to the anti republican party. Without numbers he is an host within himself. They have got themselves into a defile where they might be finished but too much security on the republican part will give time to his talents and indefatigableness to extricate them. We have had only middling performances to oppose to him. In truth when he comes forward there is nobody but yourself who can meet him. His adversaries having begun the attack he has the advantage of answering them and remains unanswered himself. For God's sake take up your pen and give a fundamental reply to Curtius and Camillas" - Thomas Jefferson to James Madison