The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined array key 0 - Line: 1677 - File: showthread.php PHP 8.2.33 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 1677 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 916 buildtree




Women
#53
Vllad Wrote:In other words I was saying that no Men are monogamous however that doesn't mean men don't have the ability to control themselves.

I am not playing word games, I am clarifying what I am saying until you understand my meaning.

From time to time I space out and mis the point of a post completely. I am re-reading your post over and over but I'm still getting the same thing. If you said "Just because you practice monogamy doesn't make you monogamous by nature" then you have a point that I might agree with. That seems to be the case but then again you say:

Quote:Just because you practice monogamy doesn't make you monogamous.

Dictionary.com Wrote:Monogamous
1. Upholding, or practicing, monogamy.

looking up monogamy:

Dictionary.com Wrote:mo·nog·a·my
n.
1. The practice or condition of having a single sexual partner during a period of time.
2.
a. The practice or condition of being married to only one person at a time.
b. The practice of marrying only once in a lifetime.
3. Zoology The condition of having only one mate during a breeding season or during the breeding life of a pair.

Brining it all together:
1. I (and many other men) meet all three definitions of monogamy (even the Zoological #3 definition)
2. Monogamous "Upholding, or practicing, monogamy"
3. I (and many other men) are monogamous


1. I am monogamous
2. I may or may not be monogamous by nature

You can argue about 2, but you can't argue about 1 (at least by the definition). You called Thudz and I women. I think you should call us honest men and be cheering us on instead of belittling us. Again, I'm not upset, I'm just happy that you are losing a definitional battle which is very unusual for you.
"Hamilton is really a Colossus to the anti republican party. Without numbers he is an host within himself. They have got themselves into a defile where they might be finished but too much security on the republican part will give time to his talents and indefatigableness to extricate them. We have had only middling performances to oppose to him. In truth when he comes forward there is nobody but yourself who can meet him. His adversaries having begun the attack he has the advantage of answering them and remains unanswered himself. For God's sake take up your pen and give a fundamental reply to Curtius and Camillas" - Thomas Jefferson to James Madison
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)